As a Foundation Representative, you have four pages in Academic Hub that no other role uses. They are all about evaluating the School Principal — fairly, on a clear yearly rhythm, and on the record. This page explains each one in plain English. If a word looks new, Section 7 — Glossary explains it.
?denied=... in the address, that is a role gate — tell Eduversal, not a bug to ignore.
These four pages work as one cycle across the school year. Read this small map first, then read each page in detail in Section 3.
Each card below tells you four things: what the page is, why we built it, what you will see, and what to do.
- Aim for at least one observation per term.
- Once you press submit, the note cannot be edited — it is a record. Re-read before submitting.
principal-appraisal-framework-v1.json; you do not need to do any maths.- Once submitted, the appraisal is immutable — it cannot be changed. This protects both you and the Principal.
- Be honest. A soft grade with no evidence helps no one; a fair grade with clear narrative helps the Principal grow.
- The 360 cycle itself (sending the links to respondents) is opened by a Central Hub admin. You read the results here.
- Respondents stay anonymous by design — please never try to guess who said what. Charter NN5: no respondent name is ever stored.
This is a soft guide, not a fixed rule. It shows the natural order across one school year.
These are not red tape — they keep the evaluation fair and trusted by Principals.
Your four evaluation pages are the core of your role, but a few other places help you do it well.
CSLS 4.1, ES 7.3, Permendiknas. Searchable, read-only.Short, plain meanings for the terms that show up most often in your pages.
CSLS 4.1. Click any chip to read the exact source text.ES 7.3 means madde 7.3. Used to ground school-quality and appraisal work.